Omparative Analysis of Pre-Trained Classifier in Augumented Approach for Ovarian Image
Main Article Content
Abstract
Ovarian cancer is identified as one of the leading cause for increased mortality rate among women. The early diagnosis of ovarian cancer decreases the mortality rate, which demands for efficient classification technique. Conventional cell classification technique extracts multiple features for recognition of ovarian cancer from complex cell texture with identification of difference between cells. To resolve complexity associated with ovarian cancer cell texture analysis deep neural network exhibits improved performance. In deep learning technique, features are extracted automatically for identification of cell types and texture. However, Annotation based approach exhibits improved classification performance still performance need to be improved for automated cancer diagnosis. To achieve higher accuracy rather than annotation this paper proposed an augmentation of MRI ovarian image. The augmented images are pre-processed with median filtering for contrast enhancement. In next stage, ROI based image segmentation is performed followed by feature extraction. To improve classification performance of augmented images CNN model Inception V3 and Xception model is comparatively examined. The performance of Inception V3 and Xception model is evaluated with Logistics Regression and Random Forest classifiers. The comparative analysis of simulation results expressed that Xception Logistic Regression model provides higher accuracy than the Inception V3 Logistics regression, Inception V3 Random Forest and Xception Random Forest.
Downloads
Metrics
Article Details
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.